Hegelian model answering essay

One of the most enticing uses of video is to add colour and specificity to respondents' comments. However, if you've videotaped a group discussion or workshop session, sending off a CD of this raises some ethical questions. You can't control who might see the video. What if some unintended recipient sees a video on the CD, where a participant who might be identified makes a statement that might harm them in some way? For that reason, it's advisable not to show participants' faces - at least while they're saying anything that has the faintest change of rebounding on them. As the researcher can't always know what the consequences of a seemingly harmless statement might be, it's safer not to show the faces of respondents, or to separate the soundtrack from the video. Ways of not showing faces include having a video camera very high in a room, so that when people are sitting around a table the video shows mainly the tops of their heads. Even safer is to have a different person (on the soundtrack) read out the statements that respondents made, so the statement can't be associated with a perhaps-distinctive voice. Be very careful, because CDs last for years, and you'll never know who might see them. It would be better to put that video or audio on a limited-access website.

Kant's Formula of Autonomy expresses the idea that an agent is obliged to follow the Categorical Imperative because of their rational will, rather than any outside influence. Kant believed that any moral law motivated by the desire to fulfill some other interest would deny the Categorical Imperative, leading him to argue that the moral law must only arise from a rational will. [26] This principle requires people to recognize the right of others to act autonomously and means that, as moral laws must be universalisable, what is required of one person is required of all. [27] [28] [29]

The issue that vexed Kant was central to what 20th-century scholars called "the philosophy of mind ". The flowering of the natural sciences had led to an understanding of how data reaches the brain. Sunlight falling on an object is reflected from its surface in a way that maps the surface features (color, texture, etc.). The reflected light reaches the human eye, passes through the cornea, is focused by the lens onto the retina where it forms an image similar to that formed by light passing through a pinhole into a camera obscura . The retinal cells send impulses through the optic nerve and then they form a mapping in the brain of the visual features of the object. The interior mapping is not the exterior object, and our belief that there is a meaningful relationship between the object and the mapping in the brain depends on a chain of reasoning that is not fully grounded. But the uncertainty aroused by these considerations, by optical illusions, misperceptions, delusions, etc., are not the end of the problems.

The moment one accepts a theory, or idea or some sort of concept, one begins with a conclusion a finished product, a picture;
What does it mean when one says, we are in the now? What takes place? Someone says we are in the now, and I accept that, interpreting and repeating and repeating, which is of memory, knowledge, past; what relationship does that have with what is? And what does that have to do with awareness, looking? And what effect does the knowledge which I have gathered have on seeing which is now? And can there be seeing which is actual when I have come to the conclusion that there is no reality? One must understand what it means to look, listen, not just peripherally, one cannot go on without it? One must Question everything and does a mind which says I know, question to begin with? Not just pose the question

Hegelian model answering essay

hegelian model answering essay

The moment one accepts a theory, or idea or some sort of concept, one begins with a conclusion a finished product, a picture;
What does it mean when one says, we are in the now? What takes place? Someone says we are in the now, and I accept that, interpreting and repeating and repeating, which is of memory, knowledge, past; what relationship does that have with what is? And what does that have to do with awareness, looking? And what effect does the knowledge which I have gathered have on seeing which is now? And can there be seeing which is actual when I have come to the conclusion that there is no reality? One must understand what it means to look, listen, not just peripherally, one cannot go on without it? One must Question everything and does a mind which says I know, question to begin with? Not just pose the question

Media: